Hi guys,

The PFN went back to the casemates and captured another shadow on one of their photos.



This time it was taken somewhere else in that location, but not far away from the area where the first shadow was captured.



I find this very interesting.

I've checked this picture, too and couldn't find any differences in the pixels.
I think we can also exclude camera failure, because on BOTH pictures the shadow is standing partially BEHIND a wall.

Again, there was nobody standing at the spot where the shadow is... so what is it????

Now that is weird. I must admit I've been struggling to make head nor tail of the first photograph. It reminds me so much of photos that we've captured or had sent to us from the HFC buy that second photo is just bizarre. What is that looks like a hunched figure moving as if going through the wall. Could that be residual ? Has the building changed at all over the years?

I have no idea , and cannot make head nor tail of it either , i must admit i was getting quite sick and tired of discussing the first one but this is even more interesting than the first one , there is nothing there that could cause the shadow so i have no idea what it could be .

Hi John,

as far as I know, nothing has been changed there, except of adding electric cables.

Canadian soldiers were stationed there, i would have to find out until when, but now it is some sort of military museum.

Hella

I still cant help but think of monks everytime i see either image..

for example..in this second image we now have...compare its outline to the right sides of these two monks..

LOL Steve, I like the Dom Perignon monk

But i can assure you, that there were never any monks or other clerics present there, other than the odd military priest.

I will try and find out more about it's history, but as far as I know that it dates further back than the thirty Years' War.

That "humped figure looks to me, as if it is a person darting off around the corner, a bit stooped, so one can only see it's back, but the head is already out of sight. the "hump" could be a backpack, the way German soldiers used to carry... it could also be a helmet, but as far as I know, they had to wear it as soon as they were on duty and weren't allowed to carry it on the back.

Here's such a backpack (tornister)



The reason why we can't see a coat is, that soldiers also used to wear coats in WW1 and 2



LOL couldn't find a better pic, but I think it gives you an idea